Search
3496 results
Filter search resultsPeer-assessment
Peer assessment can provide additional benefits beyond self-assessment – in particular, the opportunity for peer learning through the review process.MethodeCartoons
Cartoon images can be used by evaluators to an understanding of program impact, scenes of program implementation, main findings or issues.MethodeOne-Three-Twenty Five (1:3:25) Principle
The 1:3:25 Principle is an evaluation report format with a one page outline of the main messages, a three page executive summary, and 25 pages that present the evaluation findings and methodology.MethodeLearning alliances
Learning alliances involve a structured partnership between two or more organisations with the aim of working together to build and share knowledge around topics of mutual interest.MethodeFormal meeting processes
Studies have demonstrated that attendance at meetings and conferences, planning discussions within the project related to use of the program evaluation, and participation in data collection foster feelings of evaluation involvement among stMethodeSWOT analysis
The SWOT analysis is a strategic planning tool that encourages group or individual reflection on and assessment of the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and ThreatsMethodeMemos and journals for analysis
Memos and journals are useful tools to support reflection, record-keeping, and rigour throughout qualitative data analysis.MethodeGraphic recording
Graphic recording is the translation of conversations into images and text on large sheets of paper during meetings and events.MethodeEvaluation questions
This site provides a step-by-step guide on how to identify appropriate questions for an evaluation.RessourceFlip charts
Flip charts are large sheets of paper, usually positioned on a tripod, to be used with thick and differently coloured marking pens.MethodePosters
A good poster communicates your message clearly, quickly and succinctly.MethodePowerpoint
Structuring presentations with a series of powerpoint slides is now the most common way of presenting information to groups.MethodeTheatre
There are several different ways of using theatre to communicate evaluation findings and engage intended users in responding to them.MethodeStandards, evaluative criteria and benchmarks
Standards, evaluative criteria, or benchmarks refer to the criteria by which an evaluand will be judged during an evaluation.MethodeSocial media
Social media refers to a range of internet-based applications that support the creation and exchange of user-generated content - including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest and LinkedIn.MethodeContractual agreement
A formal contract is needed to engage an external evaluator and a written agreement covering similar issues can also be used to document agreements about an internal evaluator.MethodeExplaining
‘Explaining’ involves using qualitative work to understand unanticipated results from quantitative data.MethodeExamining
‘Examining’ refers to generating hypotheses from qualitative work to be tested through the quantitative approach.MethodeEnriching
‘Enriching’ is achieved by using qualitative work to identify issues or obtain information on variables not obtained by quantitative surveys.MethodeIntegrated design
Integrated Design is an approach to mixed options evaluation where qualitative and quantitative data are integrated into an overall design.MethodeComponent design
Component design is an approach to mixed methods evaluation that conducts qualitative components of the evaluation separately to quantitative components and then combines the data at the time of report writing.MethodeSystematic review
A systematic review is an approach to synthesising evidence from multiple studies.MethodeOutcomes hierarchy
An outcomes hierarchy shows all the outcomes (from short-term to longer-term) required to bring about the ultimate goal of an intervention.MethodeNegative programme theory
Most programme theories, logic models and theories of change show how an intervention is expected to contribute to positive impacts; Negative programme theory, a technique developed by Carol Weiss, shows how it might produce negative impactMethodeMural
A mural, a large drawing on the wall, can be used to collect data from a group of people about the current situation, their experiences using a service, or their perspectives on the outcomes from a project.MethodeProjective techniques
Projective techniques, originally developed for use in psychology, can be used in an evaluation to provide a prompt for interviews.MethodeMatched Comparisons
When using Matched Comparisons, participants (individuals, organizations or communities) are each matched with a non-participant on variables that are thought to be relevant which can be difficult to adequately match on all relevant crMethodeRich pictures
A rich picture is a way to explore, acknowledge and define a situation and express it through diagrams to create a preliminary mental model and can help to open discussion and come to a broad, shared understanding of a situation.MethodeDotmocracy
Dotmocracy is an established facilitation method for collecting and recognizing levels of agreement on written statements among a large number of people.MethodeInstrumental variables
This method is used to estimate the causal effect of variables on an intervention.MethodeInstitutional review board
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are committees that are set up by organizations to review the technical and ethical dimensions of a research or evaluation project.MethodeImages
Written reports and presentations should always include images. Beyond just charts and graphs, photographs or drawings increase the relevancy of the material to the audience and make the report more engaging.Methode