Search

3496 results

Filter search results
  • Q-methodology

    Q-methodology (also known as Q-sort) is the systematic study of participant viewpoints.
    الأسلوب
  • ORID

    ORID is a specific facilitation framework that enables a focused conversation with a group of people in order to reach some point of agreement or clarify differences.
    الأسلوب
  • Fishbowl technique

    The fish bowl activity is used to manage group discussion.
    الأسلوب
  • Social mapping

    Social mapping, or 'wellbeing ranking', is used to identify households using pre-determined indicators based on socio-economic factors.
    الأسلوب
  • Delphi study

    The Delphi technique is a quantitative option to generate group consensus through an iterative process of answering questions.
    الأسلوب
  • Writeshop

    A Writeshop is a writing workshop involving a concentrated process of drafting, presenting, reviewing and revising documentation of practice.
    الأسلوب
  • Summary statistics

    Summary statistics provide a quick summary of data and are particularly useful for comparing one project to another, or before and after.
    الأسلوب
  • Exploratory techniques

    Taking a ‘first look’ at a dataset by summarising its main characteristics, often by using visual methods.
    الأسلوب
  • Existing documents

    Reviewing documents produced as part of the implementation of the evaluand can provide useful background information and be beneficial in understanding the alignment between planned and actual implementation.
    الأسلوب
  • Official statistics

    Statistics published by government agencies or other public bodies such as international organizations are often useful in evaluations.
    الأسلوب
  • Previous evaluations and research

    Using the findings from evaluation and research studies conducted on the same or closely related areas is an important first step for evaluation planning. 
    الأسلوب
  • Content analysis

    Content analysis is a research method in the social sciences used to reduce large amounts of unstructured textual content into manageable data relevant to the (evaluation) research questions.
    الأسلوب
  • Participant observation

    Participant observation is used to identify the attitudes and operation of a community by a researcher living within its environs.
    الأسلوب
  • Transect

    Transect walks are a method for gathering spatial data on an area by observing people, surroundings and resources while walking around an area or community.
    الأسلوب
  • Field trips

    Field trips are organised trips where participants visit physical sites.
    الأسلوب
  • Biophysical measurement

    Biophysical measurement measures physical changes that take place over a period of time related to a specific indicator and using an accepted measurement procedure.
    الأسلوب
  • Geographical

    Capturing geographic information about persons or objects of interest such as the locations of high prevalence of a disease or the location of service delivery points.
    الأسلوب
  • Control group

    A control group is an untreated research sample against which all other groups or samples in the research is compared.
    الأسلوب
  • Realist analysis of testable hypotheses

    Realist analysis of testable hypotheses tests the program theory by developing a nuanced understanding of ‘what works for whom in what circumstances and in what respects, and how?’.
    الأسلوب
  • Check dose-response patterns

    Evaluators can examine the link between dose and response as part of determining whether the program caused the outcome.
    الأسلوب
  • Check results match a statistical model

    Program staff may develop a statistical model as part of the project theory design. Statistical models can be useful tools to predict elements of the program:
    الأسلوب
  • Check results match expert predictions

    Expert predictions can be a useful part of developing the program theory. Program staff can draw expert predictions from the literature or by engaging a group of experts.
    الأسلوب
  • Check timing of outcomes

    The program theory may predict the timing of outcomes for the evaluator to check against these dates with the dates of actual changes and outcomes.
    الأسلوب
  • Key informant

    Asking experts of programmes or in the community to predict what would have happened in the absence of the intervention.
    الأسلوب
  • Searching for disconfirming evidence/following up exceptions

    Treating data that doesn’t fit the expected pattern not as outliers but as potential clues to other causal factors and then seeking to explain them.
    الأسلوب
  • General Elimination Methodology

    General Elimination Methodology has two stages:
    الأسلوب
  • Force field analysis

    A force field analysis is used to support the decision making process by providing a detailed overview of the variety of forces that may be acting on an organisational change issue. 
    الأسلوب
  • Statistically controlling for extraneous variables

    Statistically controlling for extraneous variables is an option for removing the influence of a variable on the study of program results.
    الأسلوب
  • Ruling out technical explanations

    Ruling out technical explanations involves identifying and investigating possible ways that the results might reflect technical limitations rather than actual causal relationships.
    الأسلوب
  • Judgemental matching

    Judgemental matching involves creating a comparison group by finding a match for each person or site in the treatment group based on researcher judgements about what variables are important.
    الأسلوب
  • Difference-in-difference

    Difference-in-difference involves comparing the before-and-after difference for the group receiving the intervention (where they have not been randomly assigned) to the before-after difference for those who did not.
    الأسلوب
  • Sequential allocation

    Sequential allocation involves creating a treatment group and a comparison group by using a sequence to choose participants (e.g. every 3rd person on the list).
    الأسلوب