Decide purposes
It is important that key stakeholders agree on the main purpose or purposes of evaluation, and be aware of any possible conflicts between purposes.
The purposes of an evaluation will inform (and be informed by) the evaluation timelines, resources, stakeholders involved and choice of evaluation options for describing implementation, context and impact.
It is not enough to state that an evaluation will be used for accountability or for learning.
Evaluations for accountability need to be clear about who will be held accountable to whom for what and through what means. They need to be clear about whether accountability will be upwards (to funders and policymakers), downwards (to intended beneficiaries and communities) or horizontal (to colleagues and partners).
Evaluations for learning need to be clear about who will be learning about what and through what means. Will it be supporting ongoing learning for incremental improvements by service deliverers or learning about 'what works' or 'what works for whom in what circumstances' to inform future policy and investment?
It may be possible to address several purposes in a single evaluation design but often there needs to be a choice about where resources will be primarily focused.
Methods
Using findings
Using process
Resources
Expand to view all resources related to 'Decide purposes'
Resource
- Planning evaluability assessments: A synthesis of the literature with recommendations
- A relevância da avaliação para o investimento social privado
- Evaluation methods for the European Union's external assistance
- Exploding the myth of incompatibility between accountability and learning
- Identifying the intended user(s) and use(s) of an evaluation
- Making evaluations matter: A practical guide for evaluators
- Navigating competing demands in monitoring and evaluation: Five key paradoxes
- Planning a program evaluation
- Purposes of evaluation
'Decide purposes' is referenced in:
Blog
Framework/Guide
- Communication for Development (C4D) :
Method
Theme