Contribution analysis and estimating the size of effects: Can we reconcile the possible with the impossible?

This paper explores how contribution analysis can be used to give a quantitative sense of a contribution's importance.

Authors

Giel Ton, John Mayne, Thomas Delahais, Jonny Morell, Barbara Befani, Marina Apgar and Peter O’Flynn.

Abstract

"While contribution analysis provides a step-by-step approach to verify whether and why an intervention is a contributory factor to development impact, most contribution analysis studies do not quantify the ‘share of contribution’ that can be attributed to a particular support intervention. Commissioners of evaluations, however, often want to understand the size or importance of a contribution, not least for accountability purposes.

This paper, written by Giel Ton, John Mayne, Thomas Delahais, Jonny Morell, Barbara Befani, Marina Apgar and Peter O’Flynn, explores how contribution analysis can be stretched so that it can give some sense of the importance of a contribution in a quantitative manner.

The first part of the paper introduces the approach of contribution analysis and presents ideas to capture the change process in theories of change and system maps. The second part presents research design elements that include ranking or quantitative measures of impact in the verification of the theory of change and resulting contribution story." (Ton et al., 2019)

Sources

Ton, G., Mayne, J., Delahais, T., Morell, J., Befani, B., Apgar, M. & O'Flynn, P. (2019). Contribution Analysis and Estimating the Size of Effects: Can We Reconcile the Possible with the Impossible?. CDI Practice Paper 20, Brighton: IDS. Retrieved from: https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/contribution-analysis-and-estimating-the-size-of-effects-can-we-reconcile-the-possible-with-the-impossible/

'Contribution analysis and estimating the size of effects: Can we reconcile the possible with the impossible?' is referenced in: